The disadvantages of nuclear war

Tensions between Pakistan and India have been on the rise since the worst brutal atrocities by Indian troops on non-citizens in occupied valley and the elimination of Article 370 from occupied Kashmir. Due to the ongoing tensions between the two countries, a report by US nuclear scientists has presented terrifying and shocking figures that if a nuclear war between Pakistan and India leaves more than a million people in the lurch.

According to US nuclear scientists, everyone knows about the damage done during the war, but millions will still be killed after the war. In the case of nuclear war, the smoke emitted can leave 16 to 36 million tons of black carbon.

The magnitude of the carbon will be so high that it will see its impact worldwide in a few weeks, even in countries where it has nothing to do with the war, people will suffer serious consequences.

In the report, research scientists say that if there is a nuclear war between India and Pakistan, it will be extremely dangerous to the whole world and the consequences will be dire.
It will take more than 10 years for the world to exit, the rains will be very low, and the heat will dry out the land and the crops will be wasted.

It is a fact that wars result in the loss of indiscriminate human lives, millions of people are killed, women are left widows and children orphans.

The tense situation between Pakistan and India is of great concern to both countries and to the rest of the world, as both countries are equipped with nuclear weapons, and how can any situation between the two countries armed with nuclear weapons change? It's hard to even think about it.

To be clear, there has never been a war between the two nuclear powers so it is not possible to estimate the destruction of nuclear weapons, but if there is a nuclear war between the two countries, it is hardly possible to describe the horrors of the two countries. Someone. If there is war between Pakistan and India, even if it does not start with non-nuclear weapons, then the possibility of using nuclear weapons will certainly increase.

And they all know that war is easy to start and very difficult to stop. The world has previously been subjected to two great non-nuclear wars, the side effects of which many countries still call war. Three million people were killed in World War I and six million in World War II, meaning that in the twentieth century the population of nine million was eliminated.

While nuclear bombs are not like chemical bombs, they are very different from them. Not only can they cause much more destruction than chemical bombs, but the destructive effects of nuclear bombs last decades, even decades after their use. The radiation that followed the nuclear accident in Chernobyl in 1986 reached hundreds of thousands of miles by air, leaving Chernobyl and the surrounding cities evacuated. However, because of the radiation, remote vegetation could not be eaten or goat's milk could not be eaten.

Similarly, the events of Hero Shima and Nagaki have been more than fourteen years, it is true that life has become normal there, but it is important to consider whether the value given by the inhabitants of Hero Shima and Nagasaki is important. Is there any city in India and Pakistan that will pay that price? Atom bombs do not establish peace, so it is important that the residents of both countries and the media of both countries be fully aware of the far-reaching effects of nuclear war and the economic damage it can cause.

God forbid if a neighboring country invades another country, can its own country be protected by the radiation effects of its nuclear attack. American scientist Einstein worked on a US nuclear program, after World War II, someone asked him, "Sir!" What would the Third World War be like? Einstein replied that I do not know about the Third World War, but that the fourth war would be with great swords and poles. The catastrophe will be a major catastrophe in which countries with atomic bombs can use atomic bombs, and these nuclear weapons can cause the geography of many countries , and they will descend into the dust of such ruins that they will then have no knowledge, no art, no science, no war equipment, so they will fight each other with sticks.

The international community has a great responsibility to address the tensions between Pakistan and India. Especially on major powers such as the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Russia and China, because any sharp increase in tensions between the two nuclear countries can lead to the use of nuclear weapons, whose radiation effects only extend to those countries. They will not be confined but will go far, because destruction does not accept borders.

It is time that Pakistan and India, which are the nuclear countries and neighbors of each other, take away the thought that we should have a war between each other. It is good to hear that during Prime Minister Imran Khan's visit to the United States, President Trump offered mediation between Pakistan and India on Kashmir issue and was welcomed by Pakistan. Because Kashmir is the real cause of the dispute between Pakistan and India, but India is not serious about resolving the issue with its arrogance, though India has the best chance of peaceful dialogue.

But perhaps India is convinced of the use of force rather than peaceful dialogue, which is why Indian forces continue to fire line-of-control. But India should remember that war is a game of fire and blood that results. Destruction is destruction, poverty is rampant, disability and poverty are prosperity.